Skip to main content

Opus vs Sonnet: Opus 5.5 vs Sonnet 5.5 — Which Claude Model Should You Use?

Claude Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 differ in price (2x), speed, thinking and default effort. Benchmarks, how to choose in the API or app, and what breaks when moving from Sonnet 5.

ByUpdated
🌐 This article was machine-translated and may contain inaccuracies. Read the Korean original if in doubt.

💬 1 copy-ready prompt in this article →

Short answer: Claude Opus 5.5 is built for long-running agentic coding and judgment-heavy knowledge work, while Claude Sonnet 5.5 fits most everyday tasks where speed and quality both matter. Since Sonnet 5.5 launched on September 28, 2026, the performance gap has narrowed, but Opus still costs exactly twice as much. This guide is for developers using the API and for people choosing a model in the Claude.ai app, based on the official docs as of October 26, 2026.

🟢 Model references match the current lineup · model notice · Fable subscription
🟢 Model references match the current lineup · Claude Opus 5.5 / Claude Sonnet 5.5 / Claude Haiku 5.5 (higher tier: Claude Fable 5.1). This notice changes only when Anthropic ships a new model.

Fable 5 and 5.1 subscription (updated November 1, 2026): Claude Fable 5.1, released September 1, 2026, is the current Fable model and Fable 5 is now legacy. Plan terms are the same for both — Max, Ultra, and Team Premium plans include Fable at up to 50% of the weekly usage limit; Pro and Team Standard use usage credits ($10/M input, $50/M output tokens). The one-time $100 credit applied only to the Fable 5 transition and is not offered for 5.1. Some coding and debugging requests may be answered by an Opus model due to a security classifier (both models). See the Fable 5.1 guide and the Fable 5 availability guide for details.

What are you building? Complex multi-step coding or agent work? Yes No Opus 5.5 Accuracy, complex reasoning Sonnet 5.5 Speed and cost balance

What are the key differences between Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5?

The official docs describe Opus 5.5 as "for long-running agentic coding and knowledge work" and Sonnet 5.5 as "the best combination of speed and intelligence". Context, max output and knowledge cutoff are now identical; the differences are price, latency, whether thinking can be turned off, and default effort.

ItemClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026September 28, 2026October 7, 2026
Official descriptionLong-running agentic coding and knowledge workBest combination of speed and intelligenceHigh-volume, latency-sensitive tasks (classification, extraction, routing)
API model IDclaude-opus-5-5claude-sonnet-5-5claude-haiku-5-5
Price (input/output per MTok)$4 / $20$2 / $10From $0.10 / $0.50 ($0.50 / $2.50 for prompts over 100K tokens)
Cache read (per MTok)$0.20$0.10From $0.01
Context window1M tokens1M tokens1M tokens
Max output128K tokens128K tokens128K tokens
Relative latencyModerateFastFastest
ThinkingAdaptive (always on)Adaptive (up-front thinking can be turned off with between_tools)Adaptive
Default effort (API)mediumhighmedium
Reliable knowledge cutoffJune 2026June 2026June 2026

Source: the official models overview and model pages (checked October 26, 2026).

How big is the performance gap?

In the benchmarks Anthropic published with Sonnet 5.5, Sonnet 5.5 comes close to Opus 5.5 on several measures and beats it on one. All figures are Anthropic's own, and test settings (such as effort) vary by row.

Benchmark (as labeled)Sonnet 5.5Opus 5.5Sonnet 5 (reference)
Terminal-Bench 4.070.6%66.4% (Xhigh)10.3%
OSWorld 2.1 (partial)80.1%81.8%57.0%
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)64.5%67.7%54.9%
GDPval-AA v2.1184418461449

Anthropic also says Opus 5.5 "remains clearly stronger at complex, open-ended work requiring sustained judgment." Well-defined tasks often run fine on Sonnet 5.5; ambiguous, long-horizon work is where Opus pulls ahead.

How much more does Opus cost?

Opus 5.5 is $4 input / $20 output per million tokens and Sonnet 5.5 is $2 / $10, so Opus costs exactly twice as much. Sonnet 5.5 keeps Sonnet 5's input and output prices and halves prompt cache reads from $0.20 to $0.10 (official "What's new"). Anthropic says Sonnet 5.5 cost up to 30% less per task than its predecessor in its own testing. Prices can change — check the official pricing page, or compare monthly costs in the Claude API cost calculator.

When should you use Opus, and when Sonnet?

  • Opus 5.5: large multi-file refactors, agents that plan and execute for hours, ambiguous analysis or planning that needs sustained judgment, accuracy-critical work
  • Sonnet 5.5: everyday code writing and review, drafting and summarizing, data cleanup, chat responses — most work where speed and cost both matter
  • Haiku 5.5: classification, extraction, routing and subagents at high volume (cheapest with prompts at or under 100K tokens)

A cost-efficient habit is to start with Sonnet 5.5 and step up to Opus 5.5 only when results are shallow or you keep getting stuck. Opus 5.5 also offers Fast mode, about 2.5x faster at double the price ($8/$40).

Switching models mid-conversation: per the official docs, on the Claude API and Google-managed Google Cloud, Opus 5.5 can read Sonnet 5.5's thinking blocks, so moving a conversation up from Sonnet 5.5 to Opus 5.5 keeps its reasoning. Sonnet 5.5 can't read Opus 5.5's blocks, so stepping down runs later turns without it (the request still succeeds; unreadable blocks are dropped and not billed).

How do you switch models in the API?

Change the model string in your request — for example, from claude-opus-5-5 to claude-sonnet-5-5.

{ "model": "claude-opus-5-5", "max_tokens": 1024, "messages": [...] } Opus 5.5 request { "model": "claude-sonnet-5-5", "max_tokens": 1024, "messages": [...] } Sonnet 5.5 request swap
{
  "model": "claude-sonnet-5-5",
  "max_tokens": 1024,
  "messages": [
    {"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}
  ]
}

If you're moving from Sonnet 5 to Sonnet 5.5, a model ID change alone can break some requests:

  • thinking: {"type": "disabled"} returns a 400 → send {"type": "between_tools"} instead (not allowed with xhigh or max effort).
  • Forced tool use (tool_choice any/tool) returns a 400 → keep auto and use strict tool use or structured outputs.
  • On the Claude API, the older computer_20251124 tool is rejected → use computer_toolset_20260801.
  • Longer text between tool calls now comes back in thinking blocks, which are empty at the default display setting.

See the official What's new in Claude Sonnet 5.5 for the full list. If you're still on Sonnet 4.5 (claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929), it is scheduled to retire on November 30, 2026, with claude-sonnet-5-5 as the recommended replacement (official model deprecations page).

How do you choose in the Claude.ai app and Claude Code?

In the app, use the model picker. Per claude.com/pricing (checked October 26, 2026), Opus is available on Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise but not Free; the Free plan lists Sonnet and Haiku. Which version is the app default isn't stated in the official docs, so check the picker. Anthropic says Sonnet 5.5's default effort is medium in the apps and Claude Code and high on the API. In Claude Code, switch models with /model.

Frequently asked questions

Q. Which is better for coding, Opus 5.5 or Sonnet 5.5?
Everyday writing, review and debugging usually run fine on Sonnet 5.5 — in Anthropic's numbers it even scored higher on Terminal-Bench 4.0. Long sessions on large codebases with many design decisions suit Opus 5.5 better.

Q. Is Sonnet 5.5 more expensive than Sonnet 5?
No. Input and output stay at $2/$10, cache reads drop to $0.10, and it uses the same tokenizer, so the same text counts as the same number of tokens.

Q. What is Fast mode?
An Opus 5.5 option that responds about 2.5x faster at double the price ($8/$40).

Q. Can I still use Sonnet 5?
Yes. It's listed as legacy (still available), with retirement not sooner than June 30, 2027. Anthropic says higher-risk cybersecurity requests may be routed from Sonnet 5.5 back to Sonnet 5.

Q. What changed from Opus 5 to Opus 5.5?
Opus 5.5 performs, in Anthropic's words, "at the level of Fable 5.1 on most work", costs 40% less than Opus 5 on typical workloads and is 30%+ faster, with API pricing down from $5/$25 to $4/$20. See the Opus 5.5 guide.

In short: Opus 5.5 for complex, open-ended judgment; Sonnet 5.5 for the speed–cost balance; Haiku 5.5 for high-volume, low-latency jobs — and manage your request code around the API model IDs in the table above.

Note: Prices, specs and benchmarks are from the official model docs and the Sonnet 5.5 announcement as of October 26, 2026, and may change. Benchmarks are Anthropic's own figures. This site is not affiliated with Anthropic.

💬 Prompts for this problem

Copy, paste into Claude, and swap the parenthesised bits for your own situation.

  • 두 모델 비교 테스트, 공정하게 설계해줘

    Use when: Opus와 Sonnet 중 뭐가 나은지 직접 재보고 싶을 때

    같은 일을 Opus랑 Sonnet에 각각 시켜서 어느 쪽이 나은지 직접 재보려고 해. 일은 긴 보고서 요약이고, 내가 중요하게 보는 건 빠뜨린 내용이 없는지야. (여기를 네 작업으로)
    
    두 모델에 똑같이 넣을 지시문을 그대로 복사할 수 있게 써주고, 결과를 매길 기준 다섯 개와 배점, 채점표 양식을 만들어줘. 한 번 돌린 결과로 단정하면 안 되니까 몇 번은 반복해야 하는지도 알려줘.

All prompts →

Was this helpful?

Keep reading